Model comparison
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think
Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads 46.2 to 31.6.
Side by side
| Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 37.9 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1025 | 1291 |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1047 | 1272 |
Math Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1072 | 1305 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1295 |
Multilingual Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1063 | 1209 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1242 |
| LMArena French | — | 1260 |
| LMArena German | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1289 |
Instruction Following Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1060 | 1247 |
Long Context Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 998 | 1272 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1098 | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1091 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1058 | 1252 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?
Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?
Olmo 3.1 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.