Model comparison

o1-mini vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

o1-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.0 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

o1-mini OpenAI

34.0

Rank #235 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct Microsoft

29.7

Rank #305 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. o1-mini scores higher in 7 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where o1-mini leads 48.4 to 27.1.
  • Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

o1-mini and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct specifications
o1-miniPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
ProviderOpenAIMicrosoft
Noometry Index34.029.7
Released2024-09-122024-04-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3919

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o1-mini leads

o1-mini: 35.5 (#224), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Coding13621039
Aider Polyglot32.9%—
WeirdML36.3%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—29.6%
LiveBench Coding48%—
BigCodeBench Complete—40.6%
HumanEval+89%—
MBPP+78.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

o1-mini: 24.6 (#118), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
Cybench10%—

Reasoning Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads

o1-mini: 8.8 (#346), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13331028
ARC-AGI-20.8%—
SimpleBench18.1%—
ARC-AGI-114%—
LiveBench Reasoning72.3%—
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index135.82—
LiveBench57.8%—

Math o1-mini leads

o1-mini: 35.4 (#186), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)

Math benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Math13581089
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202546.9%—
LiveBench Math62%—
MATH Level 589.2%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)1.7%—

Knowledge o1-mini leads

o1-mini: 34.9 (#192), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Expert1316984
GPQA Diamond62.4%—
Confabulations18.6%—

Multilingual o1-mini leads

o1-mini: 43.6 (#182), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Non-English12891000
LMArena Chinese13141016
LMArena French12931039
LMArena German12781006
LMArena Japanese1245899
LMArena Korean1223856
LMArena Russian12831004
LMArena Spanish13031059

Instruction Following o1-mini leads

o1-mini: 66.7 (#206), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13041023
LiveBench Instruction Following65.4%—

Long Context o1-mini leads

o1-mini: 40.1 (#161), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1320996

Writing & Preference o1-mini leads

o1-mini: 48.4 (#202), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Text13171050
LMArena Creative Writing12441024
LMArena Multi-Turn1314989
Short-Story Creative Writing64.9%—
LiveBench Language40.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is o1-mini better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

o1-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.0 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is o1-mini or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?

o1-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.5 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do o1-mini and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. o1-mini has 39 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper