Model comparison

o1-mini vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B

o1-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.0 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

o1-mini OpenAI

34.0

Rank #235 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. o1-mini scores higher in 5 categories and OLMo 2 Furious 13B in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where o1-mini leads 34.9 to 18.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Reasoning: 72.3% for o1-mini and 16.3% for OLMo 2 Furious 13B.
  • OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

o1-mini and OLMo 2 Furious 13B specifications
o1-miniOLMo 2 Furious 13B
ProviderOpenAIAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index34.029.7
Released2024-09-122024-12-31
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3912

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o1-mini leads

o1-mini: 35.5 (#224), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LiveBench Coding48%10.4%
Aider Polyglot32.9%—
WeirdML36.3%—
LMArena Coding1362—
HumanEval+89%—
MBPP+78.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

o1-mini: 24.6 (#118), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniOLMo 2 Furious 13B
Cybench10%—

Reasoning OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads

o1-mini: 8.8 (#346), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LiveBench Reasoning72.3%16.3%
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%20.6%
LiveBench57.8%22.1%
ARC-AGI-20.8%—
SimpleBench18.1%—
ARC-AGI-114%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1333—
Epoch Capabilities Index135.82—

Math o1-mini leads

o1-mini: 35.4 (#186), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)

Math benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LiveBench Math62%13.6%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202546.9%—
Omni-MATH—15.6%
LMArena Math1358—
MATH Level 589.2%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)1.7%—

Knowledge o1-mini leads

o1-mini: 34.9 (#192), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniOLMo 2 Furious 13B
GPQA Diamond62.4%—
MMLU-Pro—31%
Confabulations18.6%—
GPQA (HELM)—31.6%
LMArena Expert1316—

Multilingual Not comparable

o1-mini: 43.6 (#182), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Non-English1289—
LMArena Chinese1314—
LMArena French1293—
LMArena German1278—
LMArena Japanese1245—
LMArena Korean1223—
LMArena Russian1283—
LMArena Spanish1303—

Instruction Following o1-mini leads

o1-mini: 66.7 (#206), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LiveBench Instruction Following65.4%60.6%
IFEval—73%
LMArena Instruction Following1304—

Long Context Not comparable

o1-mini: 40.1 (#161), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Longer Query1320—

Writing & Preference o1-mini leads

o1-mini: 48.4 (#202), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LiveBench Language40.9%11.2%
LMArena Text1317—
LMArena Creative Writing1244—
Short-Story Creative Writing64.9%—
WildBench—68.9%
LMArena Multi-Turn1314—

Frequently asked questions

Is o1-mini better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?

o1-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.0 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is o1-mini or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?

o1-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.5 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do o1-mini and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. o1-mini has 39 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper