Model comparison
o1-mini vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
o1-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.0 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. o1-mini scores higher in 5 categories and OLMo 2 Furious 13B in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where o1-mini leads 34.9 to 18.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Reasoning: 72.3% for o1-mini and 16.3% for OLMo 2 Furious 13B.
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| o1-mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 34.0 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2024-09-12 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 39 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o1-mini leads
o1-mini: 35.5 (#224), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | o1-mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 48% | 10.4% |
| Aider Polyglot | 32.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 36.3% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1362 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 89% | — |
| MBPP+ | 78.8% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
o1-mini: 24.6 (#118), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | o1-mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 10% | — |
Reasoning OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
o1-mini: 8.8 (#346), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | o1-mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 72.3% | 16.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 57.9% | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | 57.8% | 22.1% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 18.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 14% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1333 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.82 | — |
Math o1-mini leads
o1-mini: 35.4 (#186), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | o1-mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 62% | 13.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 46.9% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1358 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 89.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge o1-mini leads
o1-mini: 34.9 (#192), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | o1-mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 62.4% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| Confabulations | 18.6% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1316 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
o1-mini: 43.6 (#182), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | o1-mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1289 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1314 | — |
| LMArena French | 1293 | — |
| LMArena German | 1278 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1245 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1223 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1303 | — |
Instruction Following o1-mini leads
o1-mini: 66.7 (#206), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | o1-mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 65.4% | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1304 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
o1-mini: 40.1 (#161), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | o1-mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1320 | — |
Writing & Preference o1-mini leads
o1-mini: 48.4 (#202), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | o1-mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 40.9% | 11.2% |
| LMArena Text | 1317 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1244 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 64.9% | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1314 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is o1-mini better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
o1-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.0 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is o1-mini or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
o1-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.5 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do o1-mini and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
7 benchmarks have published results for both models. o1-mini has 39 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.