Model comparison

Nova Premier 1.0 vs Qwen Plus

Nova Premier 1.0 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.3 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Plus costs 8.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Nova Premier 1.0's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Nova Premier 1.0 Amazon

38.3

Rank #189 Confirmed

Qwen Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

37.1

Rank #210 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Nova Premier 1.0 scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen Plus in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Nova Premier 1.0 leads 33.8 to 23.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 44.8% for Nova Premier 1.0 and 63.3% for Qwen Plus.
  • Qwen Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $12.50 for Nova Premier 1.0.

Side by side

Nova Premier 1.0 and Qwen Plus specifications
Nova Premier 1.0Qwen Plus
ProviderAmazonAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index38.337.1
Released2025-04-302024-01-25
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M1M
Max output10K33K
Input $ / M tokens$2.50$0.40
Output $ / M tokens$12.50$1.20
Results tracked620

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Nova Premier 1.0: —, Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen Plus
LMArena Coding—1328

Reasoning Qwen Plus leads

Nova Premier 1.0: 23.0 (#185), Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen Plus
Kagi LLM Benchmark44.8%63.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1317
DTBench—81.1%
LMCA—24%

Math Nova Premier 1.0 leads

Nova Premier 1.0: 33.8 (#199), Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen Plus
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—17.8%
Omni-MATH35%—
LMArena Math—1326
MATH Level 5—65.3%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1.7%

Knowledge Nova Premier 1.0 leads

Nova Premier 1.0: 35.8 (#180), Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen Plus
GPQA Diamond—48.1%
MMLU-Pro72.6%—
GPQA (HELM)51.8%—
LMArena Expert—1328

Multilingual Not comparable

Nova Premier 1.0: —, Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen Plus
LMArena Non-English—1310
LMArena Chinese—1347
LMArena Japanese—1251
LMArena Russian—1323

Instruction Following Qwen Plus leads

Nova Premier 1.0: 66.8 (#204), Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen Plus
IFEval80.3%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1303

Long Context Not comparable

Nova Premier 1.0: —, Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen Plus
LMArena Longer Query—1324

Writing & Preference Qwen Plus leads

Nova Premier 1.0: 51.0 (#178), Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen Plus
LMArena Text—1326
LMArena Creative Writing—1293
WildBench78.8%—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1336

Frequently asked questions

Is Nova Premier 1.0 better than Qwen Plus?

Nova Premier 1.0 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.3 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Plus costs 8.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Nova Premier 1.0's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Nova Premier 1.0 or Qwen Plus?

Qwen Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Nova Premier 1.0 lists at $2.50 and $12.50.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 1M tokens.

How many benchmarks do Nova Premier 1.0 and Qwen Plus share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Nova Premier 1.0 has 6 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper