Model comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Nova Premier 1.0
Nova Premier 1.0 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.3 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite costs 29× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Nova Premier 1.0's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher in 3 categories and Nova Premier 1.0 in 2 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads 56.8 to 51.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA (HELM): 30.9% for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and 51.8% for Nova Premier 1.0.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $12.50 for Nova Premier 1.0.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nova Premier 1.0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | |
| Noometry Index | 37.0 | 38.3 |
| Released | 2025-06-17 | 2025-04-30 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1M |
| Max output | 66K | 10K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | $2.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | $12.50 |
| Results tracked | 33 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.5 (#173), Nova Premier 1.0: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1373 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 325.9 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.0 (#96), Nova Premier 1.0: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 36.9% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 22.2 (#205), Nova Premier 1.0: 23.0 (#185)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.5% | 44.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1377 | — |
| DTBench | 62.8% | — |
| LMCA | 18.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.94 | — |
Math Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#144), Nova Premier 1.0: 33.8 (#199)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 48% | 35% |
| LMArena Math | 1373 | — |
Knowledge Nova Premier 1.0 leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.5 (#210), Nova Premier 1.0: 35.8 (#180)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 53.7% | 72.6% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.9% | 51.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 3.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1373 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 29.1 (#114), Nova Premier 1.0: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1198 | — |
| VPCT | 30% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.3 (#134), Nova Premier 1.0: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1369 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1404 | — |
| LMArena French | 1388 | — |
| LMArena German | 1389 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1359 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1360 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1373 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1396 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.0 (#168), Nova Premier 1.0: 66.8 (#204)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 81% | 80.3% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1367 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#262), Nova Premier 1.0: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 47.2% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 56.8 (#135), Nova Premier 1.0: 51.0 (#178)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | 81.8% | 78.8% |
| LMArena Text | 1379 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1367 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1366 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better than Nova Premier 1.0?
Nova Premier 1.0 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.3 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite costs 29× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Nova Premier 1.0's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Nova Premier 1.0?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Nova Premier 1.0 lists at $2.50 and $12.50.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Nova Premier 1.0 share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33 scored results on Noometry and Nova Premier 1.0 has 6.