Model comparison
MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen Plus
MiniMax-M2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
MiniMax
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2.5 scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen Plus in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax-M2.5 leads 38.6 to 27.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 55.2% for MiniMax-M2.5 and 63.3% for Qwen Plus.
- MiniMax-M2.5 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.20 for Qwen Plus.
- Qwen Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 205K.
- MiniMax-M2.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiniMax-M2.5 | Qwen Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.1 | 36.7 |
| Released | 2026-02-12 | 2024-01-25 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 205K | 1M |
| Max output | 131K | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.20 | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 33 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax-M2.5 leads
MiniMax-M2.5: 47.9 (#53), Qwen Plus: 38.3 (#163)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1380 | 1328 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 75.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1386 | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 68.3% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 618.17 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
MiniMax-M2.5: 30.2 (#70), Qwen Plus: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 42.7% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | -23.16 | — |
Reasoning Qwen Plus leads
MiniMax-M2.5: 17.6 (#281), Qwen Plus: 27.6 (#101)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 55.2% | 63.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1372 | 1317 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.9% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 16.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 63.7% | — |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.68 | — |
Math MiniMax-M2.5 leads
MiniMax-M2.5: 25.8 (#242), Qwen Plus: 22.0 (#266)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1378 | 1326 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| ProofBench | 4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge MiniMax-M2.5 leads
MiniMax-M2.5: 38.6 (#132), Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#245)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1378 | 1328 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.1% | — |
Multilingual MiniMax-M2.5 leads
MiniMax-M2.5: 47.3 (#147), Qwen Plus: 45.3 (#170)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1338 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1392 | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1169 | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | 1359 | 1323 |
| LMArena French | 1363 | — |
| LMArena German | 1361 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1232 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1354 | — |
Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.5 leads
MiniMax-M2.5: 71.7 (#143), Qwen Plus: 69.0 (#176)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1353 | 1303 |
Long Context Qwen Plus leads
MiniMax-M2.5: 37.4 (#211), Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#153)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1367 | 1325 |
| CL-bench | 11.4% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 6.3% | — |
Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.5 leads
MiniMax-M2.5: 54.1 (#149), Qwen Plus: 52.4 (#171)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1359 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1364 | 1336 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1361 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiniMax-M2.5 better than Qwen Plus?
MiniMax-M2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, MiniMax-M2.5 or Qwen Plus?
MiniMax-M2.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Qwen Plus lists at $0.40 and $1.20.
Is MiniMax-M2.5 or Qwen Plus better for coding?
MiniMax-M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.9 versus 38.3 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen Plus does, with 1M tokens against 205K.
How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2.5 and Qwen Plus share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2.5 has 33 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.