Model comparison
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.8 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads 40.2 to 28.1.
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 32.8 | 29.2 |
| Released | 2025-12-02 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.2 (#130), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 42.7% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#127), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | 2% | — |
Reasoning Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.7 (#189), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.8 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Nova 2.0 Pro Preview and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.