Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs Nova 2.0 Pro Preview

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Opus Anthropic

29.5

Rank #310 Confirmed

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview Amazon

33.4

Rank #244 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads 40.8 to 32.9.

Side by side

Claude 3 Opus and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview specifications
Claude 3 OpusNova 2.0 Pro Preview
ProviderAnthropicAmazon
Noometry Index29.533.4
Released2024-02-292025-12-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked463

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads

Claude 3 Opus: 32.9 (#267), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.8 (#133)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusNova 2.0 Pro Preview
SciCode—42.7%
WeirdML19.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct45.5%—
LiveBench Coding38.6%—
LMArena Coding1264—
BigCodeBench Complete57.4%—
HumanEval+77.4%—
MBPP+73.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 24.6 (#116), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#136)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusNova 2.0 Pro Preview
Cybench10%—
GDP.pdf—2%
METR Time Horizons29.5%—

Reasoning Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.6 (#324), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 22.4 (#194)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusNova 2.0 Pro Preview
SimpleBench23.5%—
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles5%—
EnigmaEval0.8%—
LiveBench Reasoning40.6%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1245—
DTBench61.6%—
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%—
LMCA17%—
Epoch Capabilities Index126.91—
ForecastBench58.4—
LiveBench49.2%—
WinoGrande88.5%—

Math Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 14.8 (#299), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusNova 2.0 Pro Preview
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.7%—
LiveBench Math43.6%—
LMArena Math1273—
MATH Level 537.5%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#267), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusNova 2.0 Pro Preview
GPQA Diamond47.2%—
SimpleQA Verified12.6%—
Confabulations22.7%—
LMArena Expert1223—
MMLU84.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 27.1 (#116), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusNova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Vision1023—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 41.4 (#207), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusNova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Non-English1258—
LMArena Chinese1248—
LMArena French1275—
LMArena German1258—
LMArena Japanese1204—
LMArena Korean1187—
LMArena Russian1280—
LMArena Spanish1246—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 64.1 (#228), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusNova 2.0 Pro Preview
LiveBench Instruction Following63.9%—
LMArena Instruction Following1248—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#202), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusNova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Longer Query1259—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 47.2 (#213), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusNova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Text1262—
LMArena Creative Writing1235—
LMArena Multi-Turn1275—
LiveBench Language50.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Opus better than Nova 2.0 Pro Preview?

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Opus or Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better for coding?

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper