Model comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.2 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) scores higher in 5 categories and OLMo 2 Furious 13B in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) leads 26.2 to 18.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MMLU-Pro: 67.8% for Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) and 31% for OLMo 2 Furious 13B.
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 33.2 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2024-05-14 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 42 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 34.4 (#236), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 24.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.5% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1261 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 55.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 75.6% | — |
| MBPP+ | 67.5% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 26.6 (#102), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 14.6% | — |
Reasoning Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 21.7 (#215), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1257 | — |
| DTBench | 53.8% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 129.36 | — |
| ForecastBench | 53.9 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
| PIQA | 87.5% | — |
Math OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 22.1 (#281), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 30.4% | 15.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 16.3% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1269 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 61.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 0% | — |
| GSM8K | 82.4% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 26.2 (#260), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 67.8% | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 43.7% | 31.6% |
| GPQA Diamond | 47.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1233 | — |
| BoolQ | 85.8% | — |
| MMLU | 77.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 36.0 (#81), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1141 | — |
| Video-MME | 70.3% | — |
| GeoBench | 76% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 42.9 (#189), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1278 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1295 | — |
| LMArena French | 1258 | — |
| LMArena German | 1262 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1252 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1221 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1243 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 66.8 (#205), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 83.1% | 73% |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1258 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 39.0 (#187), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1284 | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 48.7 (#196), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | 79.2% | 68.9% |
| LMArena Text | 1287 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1253 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.2 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.4 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) has 42 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.