Model comparison

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview vs o3-mini

o3-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview Amazon

33.4

Rank #244 Reported

o3-mini OpenAI

36.7

Rank #212 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Nova 2.0 Pro Preview scores higher in 1 category and o3-mini in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where o3-mini leads 29.6 to 21.9.

Side by side

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview and o3-mini specifications
Nova 2.0 Pro Previewo3-mini
ProviderAmazonOpenAI
Noometry Index33.436.7
Released2025-12-022024-12-20
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—200K
Max output—100K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.10
Output $ / M tokens—$4.40
Results tracked351

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.8 (#133), o3-mini: 40.8 (#132)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2.0 Pro Previewo3-mini
SciCode42.7%39.8%
Aider Polyglot—60.4%
GSO—1.3%
WeirdML—43.7%
LiveBench Coding—82.7%
LMArena Coding—1378
CadEval—54%

Agentic & Tool Use o3-mini leads

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#136), o3-mini: 29.6 (#84)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2.0 Pro Previewo3-mini
Cybench—22.5%
GDP.pdf2%—

Reasoning Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 22.4 (#194), o3-mini: 16.3 (#305)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2.0 Pro Previewo3-mini
CritPt0%0.3%
ARC-AGI-2—3%
SimpleBench—22.8%
ARC-AGI-1—34.5%
Chess Puzzles—17%
LiveBench Reasoning—89.6%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1366
Mystery Game Puzzles—7%
DTBench—68.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—70.6%
LMCA—19%
Epoch Capabilities Index—140.34
ForecastBench—59.6
LiveBench—75.9%

Math Not comparable

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, o3-mini: 28.1 (#244)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2.0 Pro Previewo3-mini
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—18.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—0%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—76.9%
LiveBench Math—77.3%
LMArena Math—1396
MATH Level 5—96.5%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—12.4%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—4.2%

Knowledge Not comparable

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, o3-mini: 38.3 (#146)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2.0 Pro Previewo3-mini
GPQA Diamond—77%
SimpleQA Verified—15.3%
Confabulations—17.9%
LMArena Expert—1364

Multilingual Not comparable

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, o3-mini: 45.7 (#164)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2.0 Pro Previewo3-mini
LMArena Non-English—1319
LMArena Chinese—1379
LMArena French—1334
LMArena German—1303
LMArena Japanese—1286
LMArena Korean—1314
LMArena Russian—1304
LMArena Spanish—1321

Instruction Following Not comparable

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, o3-mini: 75.1 (#72)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2.0 Pro Previewo3-mini
LiveBench Instruction Following—84.4%
LMArena Instruction Following—1337

Long Context Not comparable

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, o3-mini: 33.8 (#256)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2.0 Pro Previewo3-mini
Fiction.LiveBench—50%
LMArena Longer Query—1343

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, o3-mini: 50.3 (#182)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2.0 Pro Previewo3-mini
LMArena Text—1337
LMArena Creative Writing—1286
Short-Story Creative Writing—61.7%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1320
LiveBench Language—50.7%

Frequently asked questions

Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better than o3-mini?

o3-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview or o3-mini better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (40.8 vs 40.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Nova 2.0 Pro Preview and o3-mini share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and o3-mini has 51.

Related comparisons

Go deeper