Model comparison

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Nova 2.0 Pro Preview

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Google

37.0

Rank #211 Confirmed

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview Amazon

33.4

Rank #244 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads 28.0 to 21.9.

Side by side

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview specifications
Gemini 2.5 Flash-LiteNova 2.0 Pro Preview
ProviderGoogleAmazon
Noometry Index37.033.4
Released2025-06-172025-12-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.10—
Output $ / M tokens$0.40—
Results tracked333

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.5 (#173), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.8 (#133)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteNova 2.0 Pro Preview
SciCode—42.7%
WeirdML35.2%—
LMArena Coding1373—
ALE-Bench325.9—

Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.0 (#96), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#136)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteNova 2.0 Pro Preview
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard36.9%—
GDP.pdf—2%

Reasoning Too close to call

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 22.2 (#205), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 22.4 (#194)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteNova 2.0 Pro Preview
Kagi LLM Benchmark40.5%—
CritPt—0%
LMArena Hard Prompts1377—
DTBench62.8%—
LMCA18.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index133.94—

Math Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#144), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteNova 2.0 Pro Preview
Omni-MATH48%—
LMArena Math1373—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.5 (#210), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteNova 2.0 Pro Preview
MMLU-Pro53.7%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate3.3%—
GPQA (HELM)30.9%—
LMArena Expert1373—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 29.1 (#114), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteNova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Vision1198—
VPCT30%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.3 (#134), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteNova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Non-English1369—
LMArena Chinese1404—
LMArena French1388—
LMArena German1389—
LMArena Japanese1359—
LMArena Korean1360—
LMArena Russian1373—
LMArena Spanish1396—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.0 (#168), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteNova 2.0 Pro Preview
IFEval81%—
LMArena Instruction Following1367—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#262), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteNova 2.0 Pro Preview
Fiction.LiveBench47.2%—
LMArena Longer Query1373—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 56.8 (#135), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteNova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Text1379—
LMArena Creative Writing1367—
WildBench81.8%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1366—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better than Nova 2.0 Pro Preview?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better for coding?

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper