Model comparison

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct vs QwQ-32B

QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.9

Rank #223 Confirmed

QwQ-32B Alibaba (Qwen)

39.8

Rank #159 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Nemotron 4 340b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and QwQ-32B in 8 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where QwQ-32B leads 49.0 to 37.1.

Side by side

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct and QwQ-32B specifications
Nemotron 4 340b InstructQwQ-32B
ProviderNVIDIAAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index35.939.8
Released2024-06-142024-11-28
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1736

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 35.2 (#228), QwQ-32B: 35.4 (#226)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwQ-32B
LMArena Coding12091333
Aider Polyglot—20.9%
BigCodeBench Instruct—44.6%
LiveBench Coding—72.2%
BigCodeBench Complete—54.4%

Reasoning Too close to call

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 23.4 (#178), QwQ-32B: 23.7 (#174)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwQ-32B
LMArena Hard Prompts12021325
Chess Puzzles—5%
LiveBench Reasoning—83.5%
LiveBench Data Analysis—65%
Epoch Capabilities Index—137.6
ForecastBench—58.3
LiveBench—72%

Math QwQ-32B leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.3 (#195), QwQ-32B: 38.0 (#143)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwQ-32B
LMArena Math12161359
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—59.2%
LiveBench Math—77.8%

Knowledge QwQ-32B leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 32.0 (#216), QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#158)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwQ-32B
LMArena Expert11711324
GPQA Diamond—65.3%
Confabulations—15.6%

Multilingual QwQ-32B leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.9 (#233), QwQ-32B: 44.8 (#176)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwQ-32B
LMArena Non-English12061305
LMArena Chinese12141378
LMArena French11971336
LMArena German11921313
LMArena Japanese11281262
LMArena Korean11481279
LMArena Russian12191297
LMArena Spanish11951354

Instruction Following QwQ-32B leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.1 (#232), QwQ-32B: 72.6 (#137)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwQ-32B
LMArena Instruction Following12031297
LiveBench Instruction Following—81.8%

Long Context QwQ-32B leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#221), QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwQ-32B
LMArena Longer Query12251308
Fiction.LiveBench—83.3%

Writing & Preference QwQ-32B leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.7 (#233), QwQ-32B: 50.6 (#180)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwQ-32B
LMArena Text12251329
LMArena Creative Writing12031288
LMArena Multi-Turn12141314
Short-Story Creative Writing—80.2%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1257
LiveBench Language—51.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better than QwQ-32B?

QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct or QwQ-32B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (35.2 vs 35.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Nemotron 4 340b Instruct and QwQ-32B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.

Related comparisons

Go deeper