Model comparison
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct vs QwQ-32B
QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Nemotron 4 340b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and QwQ-32B in 8 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where QwQ-32B leads 49.0 to 37.1.
Side by side
| Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | QwQ-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 39.8 |
| Released | 2024-06-14 | 2024-11-28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 36 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 35.2 (#228), QwQ-32B: 35.4 (#226)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1209 | 1333 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 20.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 44.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 72.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.4% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 23.4 (#178), QwQ-32B: 23.7 (#174)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1202 | 1325 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 83.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 137.6 |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.3 |
| LiveBench | — | 72% |
Math QwQ-32B leads
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.3 (#195), QwQ-32B: 38.0 (#143)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1216 | 1359 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 59.2% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 77.8% |
Knowledge QwQ-32B leads
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 32.0 (#216), QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#158)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1171 | 1324 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 15.6% |
Multilingual QwQ-32B leads
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.9 (#233), QwQ-32B: 44.8 (#176)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1206 | 1305 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1214 | 1378 |
| LMArena French | 1197 | 1336 |
| LMArena German | 1192 | 1313 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1128 | 1262 |
| LMArena Korean | 1148 | 1279 |
| LMArena Russian | 1219 | 1297 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1195 | 1354 |
Instruction Following QwQ-32B leads
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.1 (#232), QwQ-32B: 72.6 (#137)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1203 | 1297 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.8% |
Long Context QwQ-32B leads
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#221), QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1225 | 1308 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |
Writing & Preference QwQ-32B leads
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.7 (#233), QwQ-32B: 50.6 (#180)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1225 | 1329 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1203 | 1288 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1214 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 80.2% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1257 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better than QwQ-32B?
QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct or QwQ-32B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (35.2 vs 35.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Nemotron 4 340b Instruct and QwQ-32B share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.