Model comparison
GLM-4.5V vs Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 35.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIASummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5V scores higher in 8 categories and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.5V leads 52.7 to 42.9.
Side by side
| GLM-4.5V | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 39.2 | 35.3 |
| Released | 2025-08-11 | 2024-06-14 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 64K | — |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.80 | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 38.9 (#152), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.6 (#223)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | 1209 |
Reasoning GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 26.5 (#118), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 22.4 (#180)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1335 | 1202 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 59.8% | — |
Math GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 34.7 (#157), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 31.7 (#193)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1353 | 1216 |
Knowledge GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 36.8 (#155), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 31.4 (#212)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1353 | 1171 |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 33.6 (#86), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1154 | — |
Multilingual GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 44.9 (#172), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 38.0 (#228)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1304 | 1206 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1338 | 1214 |
| LMArena Russian | 1299 | 1219 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1335 | 1195 |
| LMArena French | — | 1196 |
| LMArena German | — | 1192 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1128 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1148 |
Instruction Following GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 69.4 (#170), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.3 (#227)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1311 | 1203 |
Long Context GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#166), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#216)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1305 | 1225 |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 52.7 (#162), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.9 (#229)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1333 | 1225 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1295 | 1203 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1333 | 1214 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.5V better than Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?
GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 35.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-4.5V or Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better for coding?
GLM-4.5V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17.