Model comparison
Nemotron 3 Super vs Qwen-14B
Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Nemotron 3 Super scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen-14B in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Nemotron 3 Super leads 55.9 to 27.6.
Side by side
| Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen-14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 40.1 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2026-03-11 | 2023-09-24 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.08 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.45 | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 39.4 (#158), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1403 | 1071 |
| SciCode | 36% | — |
| WeirdML | 38% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 213.9 | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Nemotron 3 Super: 18.7 (#276), Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1386 | 1027 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 15.4% | — |
| CritPt | 3.1% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 113.03 |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |
Math Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 39.6 (#101), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1380 | 1068 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 60.4% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#139), Qwen-14B: —
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1398 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.3% |
Multilingual Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 48.4 (#144), Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1355 | 1041 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1432 | 1077 |
| LMArena French | 1405 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1336 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | — |
Instruction Following Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 71.2 (#154), Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1347 | 1031 |
Long Context Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#139), Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1362 | 1028 |
Writing & Preference Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 55.9 (#140), Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1378 | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1317 | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1369 | 1022 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nemotron 3 Super better than Qwen-14B?
Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Nemotron 3 Super or Qwen-14B better for coding?
Nemotron 3 Super scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.4 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen-14B share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 3 Super has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.