Model comparison

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Qwen Plus

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.0 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning NVIDIA

40.0

Rank #155 Confirmed

Qwen Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

37.1

Rank #210 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen Plus in 4 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads 37.5 to 23.3.
  • Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.20 for Qwen Plus.
  • Qwen Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
  • Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and Qwen Plus specifications
Nemotron 3.5 LightningQwen Plus
ProviderNVIDIAAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index40.037.1
Released2026-08-112024-01-25
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window262K1M
Max output262K33K
Input $ / M tokens$0.05$0.40
Output $ / M tokens$0.20$1.20
Results tracked1820

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 40.4 (#141), Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningQwen Plus
LMArena Coding13751328

Reasoning Qwen Plus leads

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 26.8 (#127), Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningQwen Plus
LMArena Hard Prompts13371317
Kagi LLM Benchmark—63.3%
DTBench—81.1%
LMCA—24%

Math Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 37.5 (#155), Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningQwen Plus
LMArena Math13591326
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—17.8%
MATH Level 5—65.3%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1.7%

Knowledge Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 37.5 (#154), Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningQwen Plus
LMArena Expert13561328
GPQA Diamond—48.1%

Multilingual Qwen Plus leads

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 44.0 (#180), Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningQwen Plus
LMArena Non-English12951310
LMArena Chinese13591347
LMArena Japanese12061251
LMArena Russian12531323
LMArena French1366—
LMArena German1282—
LMArena Korean1238—
LMArena Spanish1345—

Instruction Following Too close to call

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 69.6 (#170), Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningQwen Plus
LMArena Instruction Following13181303

Long Context Too close to call

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 39.9 (#165), Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningQwen Plus
LMArena Longer Query13141324

Writing & Preference Qwen Plus leads

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 48.5 (#201), Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningQwen Plus
LMArena Text13271326
LMArena Creative Writing12541293
LMArena Multi-Turn13281336
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1280—

Frequently asked questions

Is Nemotron 3.5 Lightning better than Qwen Plus?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.0 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning or Qwen Plus?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Qwen Plus lists at $0.40 and $1.20.

Is Nemotron 3.5 Lightning or Qwen Plus better for coding?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen Plus does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and Qwen Plus share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper