Model comparison

Nemotron 3 Super vs Qwen Plus

Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Nemotron 3 Super NVIDIA

39.6

Rank #147 Confirmed

Qwen Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

36.7

Rank #204 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Nemotron 3 Super scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen Plus in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Nemotron 3 Super leads 37.6 to 22.0.
  • Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper at $0.08 / $0.45 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.20 for Qwen Plus.
  • Qwen Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
  • Nemotron 3 Super has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen Plus specifications
Nemotron 3 SuperQwen Plus
ProviderNVIDIAAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.636.7
Released2026-03-112024-01-25
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window262K1M
Max output131K33K
Input $ / M tokens$0.08$0.40
Output $ / M tokens$0.45$1.20
Results tracked2120

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#153), Qwen Plus: 38.3 (#163)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen Plus
LMArena Coding14031328
SciCode36%—
WeirdML38%—
ALE-Bench213.9—

Reasoning Qwen Plus leads

Nemotron 3 Super: 17.9 (#274), Qwen Plus: 27.6 (#101)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen Plus
LMArena Hard Prompts13861317
Kagi LLM Benchmark—63.3%
NYT Connections (extended)15.4%—
CritPt3.1%—
DTBench—81.1%
LMCA—24%

Math Nemotron 3 Super leads

Nemotron 3 Super: 37.6 (#95), Qwen Plus: 22.0 (#266)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen Plus
LMArena Math13811326
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions60.4%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—17.8%
MATH Level 5—65.3%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1.7%

Knowledge Nemotron 3 Super leads

Nemotron 3 Super: 38.2 (#136), Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#245)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen Plus
LMArena Expert13971328
GPQA Diamond—48.1%

Multilingual Nemotron 3 Super leads

Nemotron 3 Super: 48.6 (#139), Qwen Plus: 45.3 (#170)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen Plus
LMArena Non-English13561310
LMArena Chinese14301347
LMArena Russian13361323
LMArena French1404—
LMArena German1341—
LMArena Japanese—1251
LMArena Spanish1417—

Instruction Following Nemotron 3 Super leads

Nemotron 3 Super: 71.4 (#149), Qwen Plus: 69.0 (#176)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen Plus
LMArena Instruction Following13471303

Long Context Nemotron 3 Super leads

Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#134), Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#153)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen Plus
LMArena Longer Query13621325

Writing & Preference Nemotron 3 Super leads

Nemotron 3 Super: 56.1 (#135), Qwen Plus: 52.4 (#171)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen Plus
LMArena Text13781326
LMArena Creative Writing13171293
LMArena Multi-Turn13691336

Frequently asked questions

Is Nemotron 3 Super better than Qwen Plus?

Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3 Super or Qwen Plus?

Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper. It lists at $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.45 per million output tokens; Qwen Plus lists at $0.40 and $1.20.

Is Nemotron 3 Super or Qwen Plus better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (38.9 vs 38.3); test both on your own repository before choosing.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen Plus does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen Plus share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 3 Super has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper