Model comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.0 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher in 4 categories and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning in 4 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads 56.8 to 48.5.
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.10 / $0.40 for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | |
| Noometry Index | 37.0 | 40.0 |
| Released | 2025-06-17 | 2026-08-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 262K |
| Max output | 66K | 262K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 33 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.5 (#173), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 40.4 (#141)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1373 | 1375 |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 325.9 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.0 (#96), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 36.9% | — |
Reasoning Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 22.2 (#205), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 26.8 (#127)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1377 | 1337 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.5% | — |
| DTBench | 62.8% | — |
| LMCA | 18.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.94 | — |
Math Too close to call
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#144), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 37.5 (#155)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1373 | 1359 |
| Omni-MATH | 48% | — |
Knowledge Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.5 (#210), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 37.5 (#154)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1373 | 1356 |
| MMLU-Pro | 53.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 3.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 29.1 (#114), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1198 | — |
| VPCT | 30% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.3 (#134), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 44.0 (#180)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1369 | 1295 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1404 | 1359 |
| LMArena French | 1388 | 1366 |
| LMArena German | 1389 | 1282 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1359 | 1206 |
| LMArena Korean | 1360 | 1238 |
| LMArena Russian | 1373 | 1253 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1396 | 1345 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.0 (#168), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 69.6 (#170)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1367 | 1318 |
| IFEval | 81% | — |
Long Context Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#262), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 39.9 (#165)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | 1314 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 47.2% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 56.8 (#135), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 48.5 (#201)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1379 | 1327 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1367 | 1254 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1366 | 1328 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1280 |
| WildBench | 81.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better than Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.0 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite lists at $0.10 and $0.40.
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning better for coding?
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has 18.