Model comparison

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Pixtral Large

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.0 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning NVIDIA

40.0

Rank #155 Confirmed

Pixtral Large Mistral AI

32.2

Rank #259 Reported

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning scores higher in 2 categories and Pixtral Large in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads 48.5 to 32.9.
  • Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Pixtral Large.
  • Nemotron 3.5 Lightning accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and Pixtral Large specifications
Nemotron 3.5 LightningPixtral Large
ProviderNVIDIAMistral AI
Noometry Index40.032.2
Released2026-08-112024-11-01
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K128K
Max output262K128K
Input $ / M tokens$0.05$2
Output $ / M tokens$0.20$6
Results tracked183

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 40.4 (#141), Pixtral Large: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningPixtral Large
LMArena Coding1375—

Reasoning Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 26.8 (#127), Pixtral Large: 21.7 (#218)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningPixtral Large
EnigmaEval—0.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts1337—

Math Not comparable

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 37.5 (#155), Pixtral Large: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningPixtral Large
LMArena Math1359—

Knowledge Not comparable

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 37.5 (#154), Pixtral Large: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningPixtral Large
LMArena Expert1356—

Multimodal Not comparable

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: —, Pixtral Large: 30.6 (#111)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningPixtral Large
LMArena Vision—1089

Multilingual Not comparable

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 44.0 (#180), Pixtral Large: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningPixtral Large
LMArena Non-English1295—
LMArena Chinese1359—
LMArena French1366—
LMArena German1282—
LMArena Japanese1206—
LMArena Korean1238—
LMArena Russian1253—
LMArena Spanish1345—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 69.6 (#170), Pixtral Large: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningPixtral Large
LMArena Instruction Following1318—

Long Context Not comparable

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 39.9 (#165), Pixtral Large: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningPixtral Large
LMArena Longer Query1314—

Writing & Preference Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 48.5 (#201), Pixtral Large: 32.9 (#278)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningPixtral Large
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1280988
LMArena Text1327—
LMArena Creative Writing1254—
LMArena Multi-Turn1328—

Frequently asked questions

Is Nemotron 3.5 Lightning better than Pixtral Large?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.0 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning or Pixtral Large?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Pixtral Large lists at $2 and $6.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and Pixtral Large share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has 18 scored results on Noometry and Pixtral Large has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper