Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.3 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning NVIDIA

39.3

Rank #156 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads 48.5 to 29.3.

Side by side

Falcon-180B and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning specifications
Falcon-180BNemotron 3.5 Lightning
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteNVIDIA
Noometry Index31.839.3
Released2023-09-062026-08-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.06
Output $ / M tokens—$0.16
Results tracked1618

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 39.6 (#143)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Coding—1370

Reasoning Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 25.7 (#128)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Hard Prompts10071335
Epoch Capabilities Index111.89—
HellaSwag89%—
LAMBADA79.8%—
PIQA84.9%—
WinoGrande87.1%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 34.7 (#156)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Math—1355
GSM8K54.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 36.9 (#154)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Expert—1354
ARC (AI2) Challenge67.8%—
BoolQ89%—
MMLU70.6%—
OpenBookQA64.2%—

Multilingual Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 44.0 (#175)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Non-English10001292
LMArena Chinese—1356
LMArena French—1369
LMArena German—1280
LMArena Japanese—1213
LMArena Korean—1233
LMArena Russian—1257
LMArena Spanish—1321

Instruction Following Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 69.8 (#166)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Instruction Following10471317

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 39.9 (#160)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Longer Query—1312

Writing & Preference Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 48.5 (#198)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Text10541324
LMArena Creative Writing10891254
LMArena Multi-Turn10131327
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1280

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.3 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper