Model comparison

Pixtral Large vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Pixtral Large Mistral AI

32.2

Rank #259 Reported

Qwen3.7 Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

39.9

Rank #156 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 28.2 to 21.7.
  • Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Pixtral Large.
  • Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
  • Pixtral Large has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Pixtral Large and Qwen3.7 Flash specifications
Pixtral LargeQwen3.7 Flash
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index32.239.9
Released2024-11-012026-07-15
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K1M
Max output128K131K
Input $ / M tokens$2$0.03
Output $ / M tokens$6$0.13
Results tracked37

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Pixtral Large: 21.7 (#218), Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPixtral LargeQwen3.7 Flash
NYT Connections (extended)—43.8%
Chess Puzzles—23%
EnigmaEval0.8%—
Mystery Game Puzzles—15%
Epoch Capabilities Index—144.64

Math Not comparable

Pixtral Large: —, Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPixtral LargeQwen3.7 Flash
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—19.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—86.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Pixtral Large: —, Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPixtral LargeQwen3.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond—82.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Pixtral Large: 30.6 (#111), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkPixtral LargeQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Vision1089—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Pixtral Large: 32.9 (#278), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPixtral LargeQwen3.7 Flash
EQ-Bench Creative Writing988—

Frequently asked questions

Is Pixtral Large better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Pixtral Large or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Pixtral Large lists at $2 and $6.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Pixtral Large and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Pixtral Large has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper