Model comparison

Muse Spark vs QwQ-32B

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark Meta

50.6

Rank #46 Confirmed

QwQ-32B Alibaba (Qwen)

39.8

Rank #159 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark scores higher in 7 categories and QwQ-32B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 37.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 88.9% for Muse Spark and 59.2% for QwQ-32B.
  • QwQ-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark and QwQ-32B specifications
Muse SparkQwQ-32B
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index50.639.8
Released2026-04-082024-11-28
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2736

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69), QwQ-32B: 35.4 (#226)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwQ-32B
LMArena Coding14811333
Aider Polyglot—20.9%
SciCode51.5%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—44.6%
LiveBench Coding—72.2%
BigCodeBench Complete—54.4%

Reasoning Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67), QwQ-32B: 23.7 (#174)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwQ-32B
LMArena Hard Prompts14741325
Epoch Capabilities Index152.04137.6
CritPt11.3%—
Chess Puzzles—5%
LiveBench Reasoning—83.5%
LiveBench Data Analysis—65%
ForecastBench—58.3
LiveBench—72%

Math Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66), QwQ-32B: 38.0 (#143)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwQ-32B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202588.9%59.2%
LMArena Math14551359
ProofBench17%—
LiveBench Math—77.8%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)39%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)14.6%—

Knowledge Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13), QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#158)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwQ-32B
GPQA Diamond89.8%65.3%
LMArena Expert14571324
Humanity's Last Exam40.6%—
Confabulations—15.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24), QwQ-32B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwQ-32B
LMArena Vision1306—
LMArena Document1444—

Multilingual Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24), QwQ-32B: 44.8 (#176)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwQ-32B
LMArena Non-English14641305
LMArena Chinese15091378
LMArena French14971336
LMArena German14971313
LMArena Korean14591279
LMArena Russian14661297
LMArena Spanish14721354
LMArena Japanese—1262

Instruction Following Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51), QwQ-32B: 72.6 (#137)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwQ-32B
LMArena Instruction Following14421297
LiveBench Instruction Following—81.8%

Long Context QwQ-32B leads

Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69), QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwQ-32B
LMArena Longer Query14511308
Fiction.LiveBench—83.3%

Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39), QwQ-32B: 50.6 (#180)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwQ-32B
LMArena Text14741329
LMArena Creative Writing14591288
LMArena Multi-Turn14771314
Short-Story Creative Writing—80.2%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1257
LiveBench Language—51.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark better than QwQ-32B?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Spark or QwQ-32B better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 35.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark and QwQ-32B share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark has 27 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.

Related comparisons

Go deeper