Model comparison

GLM-4.5V vs Muse Spark

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.5V Z.ai (Zhipu)

39.8

Rank #158 Confirmed

Muse Spark Meta

50.6

Rank #46 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5V scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 37.5.
  • GLM-4.5V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GLM-4.5V and Muse Spark specifications
GLM-4.5VMuse Spark
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Meta
Noometry Index39.850.6
Released2025-08-112026-04-08
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window64K—
Max output16K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.60—
Output $ / M tokens$1.80—
Results tracked1527

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark leads

GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155), Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VMuse Spark
LMArena Coding13471481
SciCode—51.5%

Reasoning Muse Spark leads

GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119), Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VMuse Spark
LMArena Hard Prompts13341474
Kagi LLM Benchmark59.8%—
CritPt—11.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—152.04

Math Muse Spark leads

GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159), Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VMuse Spark
LMArena Math13541455
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—88.9%
ProofBench—17%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—39%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—14.6%

Knowledge Muse Spark leads

GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156), Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VMuse Spark
LMArena Expert13531457
GPQA Diamond—89.8%
Humanity's Last Exam—40.6%

Multimodal Muse Spark leads

GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92), Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VMuse Spark
LMArena Vision11541306
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Muse Spark leads

GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177), Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VMuse Spark
LMArena Non-English13031464
LMArena Chinese13371509
LMArena Russian12981466
LMArena Spanish13361472
LMArena French—1497
LMArena German—1497
LMArena Korean—1459

Instruction Following Muse Spark leads

GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175), Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VMuse Spark
LMArena Instruction Following13111442

Long Context Muse Spark leads

GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171), Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VMuse Spark
LMArena Longer Query13041451

Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads

GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170), Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VMuse Spark
LMArena Text13331474
LMArena Creative Writing12951459
LMArena Multi-Turn13321477

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-4.5V better than Muse Spark?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-4.5V or Muse Spark better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 39.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and Muse Spark share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper