Model comparison
Muse Spark vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3 Coder Next in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark leads 35.9 to 22.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 51.5% for Muse Spark and 32.3% for Qwen3 Coder Next.
- Qwen3 Coder Next has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Muse Spark | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 50.6 | 34.3 |
| Released | 2026-04-08 | 2026-02-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 27 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69), Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 51.5% | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1481 | — |
Reasoning Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67), Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 11.3% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1474 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 152.04 | — |
Math Not comparable
Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 88.9% | — |
| ProofBench | 17% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1455 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 39% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.8% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 40.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1457 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1444 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1464 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1509 | — |
| LMArena French | 1497 | — |
| LMArena German | 1497 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1466 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1472 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1442 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1451 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1474 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1477 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Spark better than Qwen3 Coder Next?
Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Muse Spark or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?
Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 36.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Muse Spark and Qwen3 Coder Next share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.