Model comparison
Muse Spark vs Qwen Max
Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen Max in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 30.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 88.9% for Muse Spark and 16.1% for Qwen Max.
Side by side
| Muse Spark | Qwen Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 50.6 | 34.7 |
| Released | 2026-04-08 | 2024-04-03 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 33K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6.40 |
| Results tracked | 27 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69), Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1481 | 1288 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |
| SciCode | 51.5% | — |
Reasoning Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67), Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1474 | 1269 |
| CritPt | 11.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 152.04 | — |
Math Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66), Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 88.9% | 16.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1455 | 1275 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 39% | 1% |
| ProofBench | 17% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |
Knowledge Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13), Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.8% | 56.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1457 | 1248 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 40.6% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24), Qwen Max: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1444 | — |
Multilingual Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24), Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1464 | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1509 | 1254 |
| LMArena French | 1497 | 1330 |
| LMArena German | 1497 | 1254 |
| LMArena Korean | 1459 | 1142 |
| LMArena Russian | 1466 | 1274 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1472 | 1290 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1205 |
Instruction Following Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51), Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1442 | 1262 |
Long Context Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69), Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1451 | 1288 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39), Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1474 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1459 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1477 | 1277 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Spark better than Qwen Max?
Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Muse Spark or Qwen Max better for coding?
Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Muse Spark and Qwen Max share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.