Model comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Muse Spark
Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 34.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 23 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 23 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 28.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 8.5% for Claude 3.5 Sonnet and 88.9% for Muse Spark.
Side by side
| Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Muse Spark | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 34.6 | 50.6 |
| Released | 2024-06-20 | 2026-04-08 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 60 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Spark leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.0 (#165), Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1342 | 1481 |
| Aider Polyglot | 51.6% | — |
| SciCode | — | 51.5% |
| GSO | 4.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 40% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 67.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 58.6% | — |
| CadEval | 48% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 81.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 32.3 (#67), Muse Spark: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 24% | — |
| Cybench | 17.5% | — |
| BALROG | 32.6% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 45.2% | — |
Reasoning Muse Spark leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 23.1 (#183), Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1305 | 1474 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.55 | 152.04 |
| SimpleBench | 41.4% | — |
| CritPt | — | 11.3% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.9% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 56.7% | — |
| DTBench | 67.8% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 55% | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.7 | — |
| LiveBench | 59% | — |
Math Muse Spark leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 19.2 (#288), Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 8.5% | 88.9% |
| LMArena Math | 1307 | 1455 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 2.1% | 39% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | 14.6% |
| ProofBench | — | 17% |
| Omni-MATH | 27.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 52.3% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 56.9% | — |
Knowledge Muse Spark leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 28.6 (#245), Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 55.3% | 89.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.1% | 40.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1265 | 1457 |
| MMLU-Pro | 77.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 19.9% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 56.5% | — |
| MMLU | 87.3% | — |
Multimodal Muse Spark leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 26.5 (#120), Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1125 | 1306 |
| Video-MME | 60% | — |
| GeoBench | 62% | — |
| VPCT | 33% | — |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |
Multilingual Muse Spark leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 43.2 (#185), Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1283 | 1464 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1272 | 1509 |
| LMArena French | 1305 | 1497 |
| LMArena German | 1297 | 1497 |
| LMArena Korean | 1200 | 1459 |
| LMArena Russian | 1306 | 1466 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1290 | 1472 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1234 | — |
Instruction Following Muse Spark leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 68.8 (#182), Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1442 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 69.3% | — |
| IFEval | 85.5% | — |
Long Context Muse Spark leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.9 (#167), Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1311 | 1451 |
Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 52.9 (#164), Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1298 | 1474 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1292 | 1459 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1326 | 1477 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 80.3% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1451 | — |
| WildBench | 79.2% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 53.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet better than Muse Spark?
Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 34.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Muse Spark better for coding?
Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 39.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Muse Spark share?
23 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Sonnet has 60 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark has 27.