Model comparison

Muse Spark vs Qwen3.6 Flash

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark Meta

50.6

Rank #46 Confirmed

Qwen3.6 Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

38.8

Rank #182 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3.6 Flash in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 42.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 89.8% for Muse Spark and 83.3% for Qwen3.6 Flash.

Side by side

Muse Spark and Qwen3.6 Flash specifications
Muse SparkQwen3.6 Flash
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index50.638.8
Released2026-04-082026-04-27
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.19
Output $ / M tokens—$1.13
Results tracked2713

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69), Qwen3.6 Flash: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.6 Flash
SciCode51.5%—
LMArena Coding1481—
ALE-Bench—326.4

Reasoning Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67), Qwen3.6 Flash: 29.0 (#96)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.6 Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index152.04143.26
SimpleBench—35.2%
CritPt11.3%—
Chess Puzzles—20%
LMArena Hard Prompts1474—
Mystery Game Puzzles—18%
DTBench—77.1%
LMCA—31%

Math Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66), Qwen3.6 Flash: 39.0 (#117)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.6 Flash
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202588.9%84.4%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)39%10.3%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)14.6%0%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—22.5%
ProofBench17%—
LMArena Math1455—

Knowledge Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13), Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.1 (#100)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.6 Flash
GPQA Diamond89.8%83.3%
Humanity's Last Exam40.6%—
SimpleQA Verified—15.9%
LMArena Expert1457—

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24), Qwen3.6 Flash: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.6 Flash
LMArena Vision1306—
LMArena Document1444—

Multilingual Not comparable

Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24), Qwen3.6 Flash: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.6 Flash
LMArena Non-English1464—
LMArena Chinese1509—
LMArena French1497—
LMArena German1497—
LMArena Korean1459—
LMArena Russian1466—
LMArena Spanish1472—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51), Qwen3.6 Flash: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.6 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following1442—

Long Context Not comparable

Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69), Qwen3.6 Flash: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.6 Flash
LMArena Longer Query1451—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39), Qwen3.6 Flash: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.6 Flash
LMArena Text1474—
LMArena Creative Writing1459—
LMArena Multi-Turn1477—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark better than Qwen3.6 Flash?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark and Qwen3.6 Flash share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper