Model comparison
Muse Spark vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 35.5.
Side by side
| Muse Spark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 50.6 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2026-04-08 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 27 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1481 | 1314 |
| SciCode | 51.5% | — |
Reasoning Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1474 | 1299 |
| CritPt | 11.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 152.04 | — |
Math Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1455 | 1298 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 88.9% | — |
| ProofBench | 17% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 39% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |
Knowledge Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1457 | 1289 |
| GPQA Diamond | 89.8% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 40.6% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1444 | — |
Multilingual Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1464 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1509 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1497 | 1231 |
| LMArena Russian | 1466 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1497 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
| LMArena Korean | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1472 | — |
Instruction Following Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1442 | 1275 |
Long Context Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1451 | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1474 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1459 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1477 | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Spark better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Muse Spark or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Muse Spark and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.