Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.2 vs Wizardlm 70b

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.2 Meta

50.3

Rank #48 Confirmed

Wizardlm 70b Microsoft

33.0

Rank #249 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 72.3 to 34.8.
  • Wizardlm 70b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.2 and Wizardlm 70b specifications
Muse Spark 1.2Wizardlm 70b
ProviderMetaMicrosoft
Noometry Index50.333.0
Released2026-08-05—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$4.25—
Results tracked3112

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 49.2 (#51), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Coding14951081
DeepSWE54.9%—
LMArena WebDev1533—
FrontierSWE12%—
SciCode56.4%—
WeirdML60.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 29.4 (#87), Wizardlm 70b: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Wizardlm 70b
APEX-Agents36.4%—
GDP.pdf16%—

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 51.3 (#34), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Hard Prompts14861079
SimpleBench74.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)79.2%—
CritPt17.7%—
DTBench94.7%—
LMCA48.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.87—

Math Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 46.4 (#70), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Math14711116
ProofBench43%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 54.1 (#53), Wizardlm 70b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Wizardlm 70b
SimpleQA Verified60.3%—
LMArena Expert1480—

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 43.4 (#25), Wizardlm 70b: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Vision1305—

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 57.1 (#11), Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Non-English14781078
LMArena Chinese15111052
LMArena Russian14871155
LMArena French1513—
LMArena German—1083
LMArena Spanish1498—

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 76.7 (#36), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Instruction Following14611093

Long Context Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 45.2 (#48), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Longer Query14751097

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 72.3 (#14), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Text14821120
LMArena Creative Writing14491149
LMArena Multi-Turn14941108
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1840—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.2 better than Wizardlm 70b?

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Spark 1.2 or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.2 and Wizardlm 70b share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.2 has 31 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper