Model comparison

Gemma 2 2b IT vs Muse Spark 1.2

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 2 2b IT Google

33.1

Rank #248 Confirmed

Muse Spark 1.2 Meta

50.3

Rank #48 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.2 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 72.3 to 36.5.
  • Gemma 2 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 2 2b IT and Muse Spark 1.2 specifications
Gemma 2 2b ITMuse Spark 1.2
ProviderGoogleMeta
Noometry Index33.150.3
Released—2026-08-05
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$4.25
Results tracked1731

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273), Muse Spark 1.2: 49.2 (#51)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Coding11121495
DeepSWE—54.9%
LMArena WebDev—1533
FrontierSWE—12%
SciCode—56.4%
WeirdML—60.3%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 2 2b IT: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 29.4 (#87)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITMuse Spark 1.2
APEX-Agents—36.4%
GDP.pdf—16%

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224), Muse Spark 1.2: 51.3 (#34)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Hard Prompts11131486
SimpleBench—74.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—79.2%
CritPt—17.7%
DTBench—94.7%
LMCA—48.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—154.87

Math Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212), Muse Spark 1.2: 46.4 (#70)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Math11351471
ProofBench—43%

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231), Muse Spark 1.2: 54.1 (#53)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Expert10961480
SimpleQA Verified—60.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 2 2b IT: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 43.4 (#25)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision—1305

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257), Muse Spark 1.2: 57.1 (#11)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Non-English11211478
LMArena Chinese11321511
LMArena French11571513
LMArena Russian11181487
LMArena Spanish11401498
LMArena German1114—
LMArena Japanese1083—
LMArena Korean1055—

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263), Muse Spark 1.2: 76.7 (#36)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Instruction Following11181461

Long Context Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250), Muse Spark 1.2: 45.2 (#48)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Longer Query11301475

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263), Muse Spark 1.2: 72.3 (#14)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text11561482
LMArena Creative Writing11471449
LMArena Multi-Turn11181494
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1840

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Muse Spark 1.2 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Muse Spark 1.2 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.2 has 31.

Related comparisons

Go deeper