Model comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Wizardlm 70b

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

50.3

Rank #49 Confirmed

Wizardlm 70b Microsoft

33.0

Rank #249 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 66.8 to 34.8.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Wizardlm 70b specifications
MiMo-V2.6-ProWizardlm 70b
ProviderXiaomiMicrosoft
Noometry Index50.333.0
Released2026-09-21—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.43—
Output $ / M tokens$0.87—
Results tracked1912

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProWizardlm 70b
LMArena Coding15341081
LMArena WebDev1629—
SciCode60.9%—
ALE-Bench1,158—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35), Wizardlm 70b: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProWizardlm 70b
APEX-Agents59.5%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProWizardlm 70b
LMArena Hard Prompts15121079
CritPt26.6%—

Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProWizardlm 70b
LMArena Math14941116
ProofBench70%—

Knowledge Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92), Wizardlm 70b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProWizardlm 70b
LMArena Expert1543—

Multimodal Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43), Wizardlm 70b: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProWizardlm 70b
LMArena Vision1264—

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14), Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProWizardlm 70b
LMArena Non-English14741078
LMArena Chinese15291052
LMArena Russian14801155
LMArena German—1083

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProWizardlm 70b
LMArena Instruction Following14931093

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProWizardlm 70b
LMArena Longer Query15011097

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProWizardlm 70b
LMArena Text14921120
LMArena Creative Writing14681149
LMArena Multi-Turn14641108

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than Wizardlm 70b?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Wizardlm 70b share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper