Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.2 vs phi-3-medium 14B

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.2 Meta

50.3

Rank #48 Confirmed

phi-3-medium 14B Microsoft

29.7

Rank #306 Reported

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher in 3 categories and phi-3-medium 14B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 54.1 to 9.1.
  • phi-3-medium 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.2 and phi-3-medium 14B specifications
Muse Spark 1.2phi-3-medium 14B
ProviderMetaMicrosoft
Noometry Index50.329.7
Released2026-08-052024-04-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$4.25—
Results tracked3113

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 49.2 (#51), phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2phi-3-medium 14B
DeepSWE54.9%—
LMArena WebDev1533—
FrontierSWE12%—
SciCode56.4%—
WeirdML60.3%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—37.6%
LMArena Coding1495—
BigCodeBench Complete—48.7%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 29.4 (#87), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2phi-3-medium 14B
APEX-Agents36.4%—
GDP.pdf16%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 51.3 (#34), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2phi-3-medium 14B
Epoch Capabilities Index154.87121.23
SimpleBench74.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)79.2%—
CritPt17.7%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1486—
DTBench94.7%—
LMCA48.4%—
Adversarial NLI—55.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—81.4%
HellaSwag—82.4%
WinoGrande—81.5%

Math Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 46.4 (#70), phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2phi-3-medium 14B
ProofBench43%—
LMArena Math1471—
MATH Level 5—17.6%

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 54.1 (#53), phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2phi-3-medium 14B
GPQA Diamond—27.6%
SimpleQA Verified60.3%—
LMArena Expert1480—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—91.6%
MMLU—78%
OpenBookQA—87.4%
TriviaQA—73.9%

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 43.4 (#25), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2phi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Vision1305—

Multilingual Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 57.1 (#11), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2phi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Non-English1478—
LMArena Chinese1511—
LMArena French1513—
LMArena Russian1487—
LMArena Spanish1498—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 76.7 (#36), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2phi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Instruction Following1461—

Long Context Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 45.2 (#48), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2phi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Longer Query1475—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 72.3 (#14), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2phi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Text1482—
LMArena Creative Writing1449—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1840—
LMArena Multi-Turn1494—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.2 better than phi-3-medium 14B?

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Spark 1.2 or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 36.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.2 and phi-3-medium 14B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.2 has 31 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper