Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.2 vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.2 Meta

50.3

Rank #48 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 51.3 to 15.5.
  • OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.2 and OLMo 2 Furious 13B specifications
Muse Spark 1.2OLMo 2 Furious 13B
ProviderMetaAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index50.329.7
Released2026-08-052024-12-31
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$4.25—
Results tracked3112

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 49.2 (#51), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2OLMo 2 Furious 13B
DeepSWE54.9%—
LMArena WebDev1533—
FrontierSWE12%—
SciCode56.4%—
WeirdML60.3%—
LiveBench Coding—10.4%
LMArena Coding1495—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 29.4 (#87), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2OLMo 2 Furious 13B
APEX-Agents36.4%—
GDP.pdf16%—

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 51.3 (#34), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2OLMo 2 Furious 13B
SimpleBench74.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)79.2%—
CritPt17.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning—16.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1486—
DTBench94.7%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—20.6%
LMCA48.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.87—
LiveBench—22.1%

Math Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 46.4 (#70), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2OLMo 2 Furious 13B
ProofBench43%—
Omni-MATH—15.6%
LiveBench Math—13.6%
LMArena Math1471—

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 54.1 (#53), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2OLMo 2 Furious 13B
SimpleQA Verified60.3%—
MMLU-Pro—31%
GPQA (HELM)—31.6%
LMArena Expert1480—

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 43.4 (#25), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2OLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Vision1305—

Multilingual Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 57.1 (#11), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2OLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Non-English1478—
LMArena Chinese1511—
LMArena French1513—
LMArena Russian1487—
LMArena Spanish1498—

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 76.7 (#36), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2OLMo 2 Furious 13B
LiveBench Instruction Following—60.6%
IFEval—73%
LMArena Instruction Following1461—

Long Context Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 45.2 (#48), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2OLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Longer Query1475—

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 72.3 (#14), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2OLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Text1482—
LMArena Creative Writing1449—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1840—
WildBench—68.9%
LMArena Multi-Turn1494—
LiveBench Language—11.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.2 better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Spark 1.2 or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.2 and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.2 has 31 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper