Model comparison

Muse Spark vs phi-3-medium 14B

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark Meta

50.6

Rank #46 Confirmed

phi-3-medium 14B Microsoft

29.7

Rank #306 Reported

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark scores higher in 3 categories and phi-3-medium 14B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 9.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 89.8% for Muse Spark and 27.6% for phi-3-medium 14B.
  • phi-3-medium 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark and phi-3-medium 14B specifications
Muse Sparkphi-3-medium 14B
ProviderMetaMicrosoft
Noometry Index50.629.7
Released2026-04-082024-04-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2713

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69), phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Sparkphi-3-medium 14B
SciCode51.5%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—37.6%
LMArena Coding1481—
BigCodeBench Complete—48.7%

Reasoning Not comparable

Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Sparkphi-3-medium 14B
Epoch Capabilities Index152.04121.23
CritPt11.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1474—
Adversarial NLI—55.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—81.4%
HellaSwag—82.4%
WinoGrande—81.5%

Math Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66), phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Sparkphi-3-medium 14B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202588.9%—
ProofBench17%—
LMArena Math1455—
MATH Level 5—17.6%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)39%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)14.6%—

Knowledge Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13), phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Sparkphi-3-medium 14B
GPQA Diamond89.8%27.6%
Humanity's Last Exam40.6%—
LMArena Expert1457—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—91.6%
MMLU—78%
OpenBookQA—87.4%
TriviaQA—73.9%

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Sparkphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Vision1306—
LMArena Document1444—

Multilingual Not comparable

Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Sparkphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Non-English1464—
LMArena Chinese1509—
LMArena French1497—
LMArena German1497—
LMArena Korean1459—
LMArena Russian1466—
LMArena Spanish1472—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Sparkphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Instruction Following1442—

Long Context Not comparable

Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Sparkphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Longer Query1451—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Sparkphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Text1474—
LMArena Creative Writing1459—
LMArena Multi-Turn1477—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark better than phi-3-medium 14B?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Spark or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 36.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark and phi-3-medium 14B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark has 27 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper