Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.2 vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.8 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.2 Meta

49.8

Rank #44 Confirmed

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 Alibaba (Qwen)

38.1

Rank #179 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 50.4 to 24.8.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 specifications
Muse Spark 1.2Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index49.838.1
Released2026-08-05—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$4.25—
Results tracked2814

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 48.6 (#49), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 37.9 (#171)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Coding14971314
DeepSWE54.9%—
LMArena WebDev1532—
FrontierSWE12%—
SciCode56.4%—
WeirdML60.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 29.5 (#77), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
APEX-Agents36.4%—
GDP.pdf16%—

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 50.4 (#32), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 24.8 (#139)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Hard Prompts14901299
SimpleBench74.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)79.2%—
CritPt17.7%—
DTBench94.7%—
LMCA48.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index155.18—

Math Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 43.8 (#68), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 33.5 (#175)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
ProofBench43%—
LMArena Math—1298

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 53.9 (#49), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 34.9 (#179)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Expert14851289
SimpleQA Verified60.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 42.6 (#24), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Vision1304—

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 57.4 (#10), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 42.1 (#196)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Non-English14791265
LMArena Chinese15191314
LMArena Russian14941271
LMArena German—1231
LMArena Japanese—1207

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 77.1 (#30), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.4 (#194)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Instruction Following14661275

Long Context Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 45.4 (#35), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#180)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Longer Query14831292

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 72.6 (#14), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.5 (#186)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Text14861299
LMArena Creative Writing14441262
LMArena Multi-Turn15041299
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1840—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.2 better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.8 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Spark 1.2 or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 37.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.2 has 28 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper