Model comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 53.2 to 28.1.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.6-Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 46.7 | 29.2 |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.43 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.87 | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 53.2 (#27), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1618 | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1538 | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 30.4 (#76), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1511 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.9 (#91), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1497 | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.0 (#85), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1548 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.2 (#40), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1265 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 57.0 (#15), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1474 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1532 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1481 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#10), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1490 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#26), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1500 | — |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.9 (#32), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1491 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1465 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1463 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.2 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Pro and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.