Model comparison

Muse Spark vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark Meta

50.6

Rank #46 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 18.3.
  • OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark and OLMo 2 Furious 13B specifications
Muse SparkOLMo 2 Furious 13B
ProviderMetaAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index50.629.7
Released2026-04-082024-12-31
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2712

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkOLMo 2 Furious 13B
SciCode51.5%—
LiveBench Coding—10.4%
LMArena Coding1481—

Reasoning Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkOLMo 2 Furious 13B
CritPt11.3%—
LiveBench Reasoning—16.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1474—
LiveBench Data Analysis—20.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index152.04—
LiveBench—22.1%

Math Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkOLMo 2 Furious 13B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202588.9%—
ProofBench17%—
Omni-MATH—15.6%
LiveBench Math—13.6%
LMArena Math1455—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)39%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)14.6%—

Knowledge Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkOLMo 2 Furious 13B
GPQA Diamond89.8%—
Humanity's Last Exam40.6%—
MMLU-Pro—31%
GPQA (HELM)—31.6%
LMArena Expert1457—

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Vision1306—
LMArena Document1444—

Multilingual Not comparable

Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Non-English1464—
LMArena Chinese1509—
LMArena French1497—
LMArena German1497—
LMArena Korean1459—
LMArena Russian1466—
LMArena Spanish1472—

Instruction Following Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LiveBench Instruction Following—60.6%
IFEval—73%
LMArena Instruction Following1442—

Long Context Not comparable

Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Longer Query1451—

Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Text1474—
LMArena Creative Writing1459—
WildBench—68.9%
LMArena Multi-Turn1477—
LiveBench Language—11.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Spark or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark has 27 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper