Noometry

Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.2 vs Nova Premier 1.0

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.2 Meta

50.3

Rank #48 Confirmed

Nova Premier 1.0 Amazon

38.3

Rank #189 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 51.3 to 23.0.
  • Muse Spark 1.2 is cheaper at $1.25 / $4.25 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $12.50 for Nova Premier 1.0.
  • Muse Spark 1.2 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.2Nova Premier 1.0
ProviderMetaAmazon
Noometry Index50.338.3
Released2026-08-052025-04-30
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M1M
Max output131K10K
Input $ / M tokens$1.25$2.50
Output $ / M tokens$4.25$12.50
Results tracked316

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 49.2 (#51), Nova Premier 1.0: —

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Nova Premier 1.0
DeepSWE54.9%—
LMArena WebDev1533—
FrontierSWE12%—
SciCode56.4%—
WeirdML60.3%—
LMArena Coding1495—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 29.4 (#87), Nova Premier 1.0: —

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Nova Premier 1.0
APEX-Agents36.4%—
GDP.pdf16%—

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 51.3 (#34), Nova Premier 1.0: 23.0 (#185)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Nova Premier 1.0
SimpleBench74.5%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—44.8%
NYT Connections (extended)79.2%—
CritPt17.7%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1486—
DTBench94.7%—
LMCA48.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.87—

Math Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 46.4 (#70), Nova Premier 1.0: 33.8 (#199)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Nova Premier 1.0
ProofBench43%—
Omni-MATH—35%
LMArena Math1471—

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 54.1 (#53), Nova Premier 1.0: 35.8 (#180)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Nova Premier 1.0
SimpleQA Verified60.3%—
MMLU-Pro—72.6%
GPQA (HELM)—51.8%
LMArena Expert1480—

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 43.4 (#25), Nova Premier 1.0: —

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Nova Premier 1.0
LMArena Vision1305—

Multilingual Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 57.1 (#11), Nova Premier 1.0: —

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Nova Premier 1.0
LMArena Non-English1478—
LMArena Chinese1511—
LMArena French1513—
LMArena Russian1487—
LMArena Spanish1498—

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 76.7 (#36), Nova Premier 1.0: 66.8 (#204)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Nova Premier 1.0
IFEval—80.3%
LMArena Instruction Following1461—

Long Context Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 45.2 (#48), Nova Premier 1.0: —

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Nova Premier 1.0
LMArena Longer Query1475—

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 72.3 (#14), Nova Premier 1.0: 51.0 (#178)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Nova Premier 1.0
LMArena Text1482—
LMArena Creative Writing1449—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1840—
WildBench—78.8%
LMArena Multi-Turn1494—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.2 better than Nova Premier 1.0?

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.2 or Nova Premier 1.0?

Muse Spark 1.2 is cheaper. It lists at $1.25 per million input tokens and $4.25 per million output tokens; Nova Premier 1.0 lists at $2.50 and $12.50.

Which has the bigger context window?

Muse Spark 1.2 does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.2 and Nova Premier 1.0 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.2 has 31 scored results on Noometry and Nova Premier 1.0 has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper