Model comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Nova Premier 1.0

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

50.3

Rank #49 Confirmed

Nova Premier 1.0 Amazon

38.3

Rank #189 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 54.5 to 33.8.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $12.50 for Nova Premier 1.0.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Nova Premier 1.0 specifications
MiMo-V2.6-ProNova Premier 1.0
ProviderXiaomiAmazon
Noometry Index50.338.3
Released2026-09-212025-04-30
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1.05M1M
Max output131K10K
Input $ / M tokens$0.43$2.50
Output $ / M tokens$0.87$12.50
Results tracked196

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23), Nova Premier 1.0: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProNova Premier 1.0
LMArena WebDev1629—
SciCode60.9%—
LMArena Coding1534—
ALE-Bench1,158—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35), Nova Premier 1.0: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProNova Premier 1.0
APEX-Agents59.5%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50), Nova Premier 1.0: 23.0 (#185)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProNova Premier 1.0
Kagi LLM Benchmark—44.8%
CritPt26.6%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1512—

Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45), Nova Premier 1.0: 33.8 (#199)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProNova Premier 1.0
ProofBench70%—
Omni-MATH—35%
LMArena Math1494—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92), Nova Premier 1.0: 35.8 (#180)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProNova Premier 1.0
MMLU-Pro—72.6%
GPQA (HELM)—51.8%
LMArena Expert1543—

Multimodal Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43), Nova Premier 1.0: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProNova Premier 1.0
LMArena Vision1264—

Multilingual Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14), Nova Premier 1.0: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProNova Premier 1.0
LMArena Non-English1474—
LMArena Chinese1529—
LMArena Russian1480—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12), Nova Premier 1.0: 66.8 (#204)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProNova Premier 1.0
IFEval—80.3%
LMArena Instruction Following1493—

Long Context Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27), Nova Premier 1.0: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProNova Premier 1.0
LMArena Longer Query1501—

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33), Nova Premier 1.0: 51.0 (#178)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProNova Premier 1.0
LMArena Text1492—
LMArena Creative Writing1468—
WildBench—78.8%
LMArena Multi-Turn1464—

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than Nova Premier 1.0?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Nova Premier 1.0?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Nova Premier 1.0 lists at $2.50 and $12.50.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Nova Premier 1.0 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19 scored results on Noometry and Nova Premier 1.0 has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper