Noometry

Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.1 Meta

49.9

Rank #51 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 Max Preview Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #71 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 2 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 47.1 to 30.8.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.1Qwen3.5 Max Preview
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index49.945.3
Released2026-04-08—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$4.25—
Results tracked3717

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 51.3 (#40), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Coding14981487
DeepSWE53.3%—
LMArena WebDev1542—
SciCode58.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 30.8 (#73), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3.5 Max Preview
APEX-Agents31.8%—
τ²-bench Banking40.5%—
GBAEval7.9%—
GDP.pdf15%—
Vending-Bench 26,520—

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 47.1 (#44), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Hard Prompts14861483
NYT Connections (extended)84.9%—
CritPt15.1%—
DTBench94.4%—
LMCA49.9%—
Surface Evolver Bench52.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.21—

Math Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 45.5 (#76), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Math14831474
ProofBench39%—

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 53.1 (#59), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Expert14781489
SimpleQA Verified57.8%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 42.6 (#29), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Vision1293—
LMArena Document1465—

Multilingual Too close to call

Muse Spark 1.1: 56.7 (#17), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Non-English14721465
LMArena Chinese15181534
LMArena French14941484
LMArena German14661487
LMArena Japanese14511495
LMArena Korean14581438
LMArena Russian14831471
LMArena Spanish14641470

Instruction Following Too close to call

Muse Spark 1.1: 76.5 (#39), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Instruction Following14571467

Long Context Too close to call

Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#58), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Longer Query14621476

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 73.4 (#11), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Text14791470
LMArena Creative Writing14371464
LMArena Multi-Turn14851478
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1927—
EQ-Bench 41260—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.1 better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.3 versus 44.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.1 has 37 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper