Model comparison
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 73.6 to 40.1.
Side by side
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 49.5 | 45.3 |
| Released | 2026-10-07 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 49.2 (#50), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1587 | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1487 |
Reasoning Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 35.2 (#69), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 65.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1483 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 30% | — |
Math Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 73.6 (#18), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 75.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46.3% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1474 |
Knowledge Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 50.8 (#70), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 23.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1489 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: 43.7 (#21), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 47.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1534 |
| LMArena French | — | 1484 |
| LMArena German | — | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1495 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1438 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1470 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1467 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1476 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1470 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1478 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?
Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 44.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 5.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.