Model comparison
Muse Spark 1.1 vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 52.8 to 19.2.
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Muse Spark 1.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 49.9 | 32.2 |
| Released | 2026-04-08 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.25 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4.25 | — |
| Results tracked | 36 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Muse Spark 1.1: 50.8 (#38), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1497 | 1210 |
| DeepSWE | 53.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1542 | — |
| SciCode | 58.8% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Muse Spark 1.1: 33.9 (#45), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench Banking | 40.5% | — |
| GBAEval | 7.9% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 15% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 6,520 | — |
Reasoning Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Muse Spark 1.1: 45.9 (#41), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1486 | 1208 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 84.9% | — |
| CritPt | 15.1% | — |
| DTBench | 94.4% | — |
| LMCA | 49.9% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 52.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.32 | — |
Math Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Muse Spark 1.1: 44.0 (#67), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1477 | 1208 |
| ProofBench | 39% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |
Knowledge Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Muse Spark 1.1: 52.8 (#55), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleQA Verified | 57.8% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1480 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Muse Spark 1.1: 41.9 (#28), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1292 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1465 | — |
Multilingual Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Muse Spark 1.1: 56.8 (#16), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1471 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1518 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 1482 | 1187 |
| LMArena French | 1494 | — |
| LMArena German | 1466 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1445 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1471 | — |
Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Muse Spark 1.1: 76.8 (#36), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1457 | 1186 |
| IFEval | — | 78% |
Long Context Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#55), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1463 | 1194 |
Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Muse Spark 1.1: 73.6 (#11), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1479 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1440 | 1199 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1484 | 1221 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1927 | — |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1260 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Spark 1.1 better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?
Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Muse Spark 1.1 or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?
Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.8 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.1 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.1 has 36 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.