Noometry

Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.2 vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.2 Meta

50.3

Rank #48 Confirmed

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)

32.7

Rank #254 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 54.1 to 19.5.
  • Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.2Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
ProviderMetaAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index50.332.7
Released2026-08-05—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$4.25—
Results tracked3116

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 49.2 (#51), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding14951210
DeepSWE54.9%—
LMArena WebDev1533—
FrontierSWE12%—
SciCode56.4%—
WeirdML60.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 29.4 (#87), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
APEX-Agents36.4%—
GDP.pdf16%—

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 51.3 (#34), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14861208
SimpleBench74.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)79.2%—
CritPt17.7%—
DTBench94.7%—
LMCA48.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.87—

Math Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 46.4 (#70), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Math14711208
ProofBench43%—
Omni-MATH—16.1%

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 54.1 (#53), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
SimpleQA Verified60.3%—
MMLU-Pro—41.4%
GPQA (HELM)—28.7%
LMArena Expert1480—

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 43.4 (#25), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Vision1305—

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 57.1 (#11), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English14781160
LMArena Chinese15111192
LMArena Russian14871187
LMArena French1513—
LMArena Spanish1498—

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 76.7 (#36), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14611186
IFEval—78%

Long Context Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 45.2 (#48), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14751194

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 72.3 (#14), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Text14821218
LMArena Creative Writing14491199
LMArena Multi-Turn14941221
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1840—
WildBench—73.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.2 better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Spark 1.2 or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.2 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.2 has 31 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper