Model comparison
Muse Spark vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 19.5.
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Muse Spark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 50.6 | 32.7 |
| Released | 2026-04-08 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 27 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1481 | 1210 |
| SciCode | 51.5% | — |
Reasoning Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1474 | 1208 |
| CritPt | 11.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 152.04 | — |
Math Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1455 | 1208 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 88.9% | — |
| ProofBench | 17% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 39% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |
Knowledge Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.8% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 40.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1457 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1444 | — |
Multilingual Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1464 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1509 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 1466 | 1187 |
| LMArena French | 1497 | — |
| LMArena German | 1497 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1472 | — |
Instruction Following Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1442 | 1186 |
| IFEval | — | 78% |
Long Context Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1451 | 1194 |
Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1474 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1459 | 1199 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1477 | 1221 |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Spark better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?
Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Muse Spark or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?
Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Muse Spark and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark has 27 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.