Model comparison
Muse Glimmer vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Glimmer scores higher in 8 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Muse Glimmer leads 38.8 to 14.2.
Side by side
| Muse Glimmer | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 41.7 | 33.0 |
| Released | 2026-08-10 | 2024-11-21 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 36.0 (#214)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1416 | 1235 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1355 | — |
| SciCode | 44.9% | — |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 23.9 (#169)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1396 | 1220 |
| CritPt | 2.6% | — |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 14.2 (#303)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1417 | 1242 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 4.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 42.7% |
Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1386 | — |
Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 39.9 (#222)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1384 | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1412 | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | 1390 | 1246 |
Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 64.8 (#227)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1375 | 1233 |
Long Context Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#222)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1382 | 1224 |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.6 (#223)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1389 | 1256 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1339 | 1231 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1399 | 1252 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Glimmer better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Muse Glimmer or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?
Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Muse Glimmer and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Glimmer has 15 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.