Model comparison
Muse Glimmer vs Wizardlm 70b
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Meta
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Glimmer scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Glimmer leads 57.5 to 34.8.
Side by side
| Muse Glimmer | Wizardlm 70b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 41.7 | 33.0 |
| Released | 2026-08-10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1416 | 1081 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1355 | — |
| SciCode | 44.9% | — |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1396 | 1079 |
| CritPt | 2.6% | — |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1417 | 1116 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1386 | — |
Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122), Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1384 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1412 | 1052 |
| LMArena Russian | 1390 | 1155 |
| LMArena German | — | 1083 |
Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1375 | 1093 |
Long Context Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1382 | 1097 |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1389 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1339 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1399 | 1108 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Glimmer better than Wizardlm 70b?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Muse Glimmer or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?
Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Muse Glimmer and Wizardlm 70b share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Glimmer has 15 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.