Model comparison

ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.8

Rank #129 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 7 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 39.3 to 14.2.
  • Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B specifications
ERNIE 5.0 0110Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
ProviderBaiduAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index41.833.0
Released—2024-11-21
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2014

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 36.0 (#214)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Coding14551235

Reasoning Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 23.9 (#169)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Hard Prompts14451220
NYT Connections (extended)10.3%—
Thematic Generalization41.7%—

Math ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 14.2 (#303)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Math14371242
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—4.4%
MATH Level 5—42.7%

Knowledge ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.0 (#264)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
GPQA Diamond—46.3%
LMArena Expert1428—

Multimodal Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Vision1249—

Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 39.9 (#222)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Non-English14361236
LMArena Chinese15121249
LMArena Russian14461246
LMArena French1467—
LMArena German1460—
LMArena Japanese1382—
LMArena Korean1406—
LMArena Spanish1473—

Instruction Following ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 64.8 (#227)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Instruction Following14131233

Long Context ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#222)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Longer Query14221224

Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.6 (#223)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Text14451256
LMArena Creative Writing14261231
LMArena Multi-Turn14341252

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper