Model comparison
Muse Glimmer vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Glimmer scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3 Coder Next in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Muse Glimmer leads 40.4 to 36.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 44.9% for Muse Glimmer and 32.3% for Qwen3 Coder Next.
Side by side
| Muse Glimmer | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.7 | 34.3 |
| Released | 2026-08-10 | 2026-02-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 15 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142), Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 44.9% | 32.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1355 | — |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1416 | — |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144), Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 2.6% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1396 | — |
Math Not comparable
Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1417 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1386 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1384 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1412 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1390 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1375 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1382 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1389 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1339 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1399 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Glimmer better than Qwen3 Coder Next?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Muse Glimmer or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?
Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 36.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Muse Glimmer and Qwen3 Coder Next share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Glimmer has 15 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.