Model comparison
ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Qwen3 Coder Next
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 43.0 to 36.3.
- Qwen3 Coder Next has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 34.3 |
| Released | — | 2026-02-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 20 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | — |
Reasoning Qwen3 Coder Next leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | — |
Math Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1428 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1249 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | — |
| LMArena French | 1467 | — |
| LMArena German | 1460 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1382 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1434 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Qwen3 Coder Next?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 36.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Qwen3 Coder Next share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.