Model comparison
Muse Glimmer vs Qwen Max
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Glimmer scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen Max in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Muse Glimmer leads 38.8 to 22.3.
- Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Muse Glimmer | Qwen Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.7 | 34.7 |
| Released | 2026-08-10 | 2024-04-03 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 33K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6.40 |
| Results tracked | 15 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142), Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1416 | 1288 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1355 | — |
| SciCode | 44.9% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144), Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1396 | 1269 |
| CritPt | 2.6% | — |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125), Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1417 | 1275 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 16.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |
Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143), Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1386 | 1248 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122), Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1384 | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1412 | 1254 |
| LMArena Russian | 1390 | 1274 |
| LMArena French | — | 1330 |
| LMArena German | — | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1142 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1290 |
Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135), Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1375 | 1262 |
Long Context Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129), Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1382 | 1288 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126), Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1389 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1339 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1399 | 1277 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Glimmer better than Qwen Max?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Muse Glimmer or Qwen Max better for coding?
Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Muse Glimmer and Qwen Max share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Glimmer has 15 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.