Model comparison
Muse Glimmer vs Qwen1.5-7B
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Glimmer scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Glimmer leads 57.7 to 29.8.
Side by side
| Muse Glimmer | Qwen1.5-7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 30.8 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 38.7 (#157), Qwen1.5-7B: 31.6 (#271)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1417 | 1107 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1355 | — |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 27.2 (#111), Qwen1.5-7B: 19.5 (#237)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1395 | 1066 |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 36.1 (#128), Qwen1.5-7B: 29.0 (#222)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1419 | 1080 |
Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 37.9 (#140), Qwen1.5-7B: 28.2 (#239)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1388 | 1055 |
| MMLU | — | 62.6% |
Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 50.6 (#117), Qwen1.5-7B: 28.6 (#266)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1384 | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1412 | 1140 |
| LMArena Russian | 1393 | 1006 |
Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 72.7 (#134), Qwen1.5-7B: 54.4 (#276)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | 1058 |
Long Context Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#124), Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#261)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1381 | 1090 |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 57.7 (#122), Qwen1.5-7B: 29.8 (#288)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1389 | 1084 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1338 | 1035 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1398 | 1061 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Glimmer better than Qwen1.5-7B?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Muse Glimmer or Qwen1.5-7B better for coding?
Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Muse Glimmer and Qwen1.5-7B share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Glimmer has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-7B has 13.